SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 333

UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY, D.JAGANNADHA RAJU
Kanchanapalli Lalithakumari – Appellant
Versus
Kanchanapalli Ramaprasada Rao – Respondent


D. J. JAGANNADHA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed against the judgment and decree in O. P. No. 490 of 1982 dated 8th March, 1988, on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, vijayawada. The respondent-husband filed the O. P. for divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter called the Act ). The wife opposed the petition and she alleged that variousallegations in the petition are false and she was never guilty of cruelty to the husband. On the other hand, the husband was guilty of cruelty towards her. She claims that she was harassed and she was fleeced of money and they have not been living apart and even after the filing of the O. P. , the husband has been visiting her.

( 2 ) THE court, after elaborate consideration, came to the conclusion that the wife is guilty of cruelty both on the basis of the allegations made in the petition which were spoken to by P. W. I and his father P. W. 2 and also on the basis of unfounded, baseless and reckless allegations made in the written statement filed by the wife and the subsequent events.

( 3 ) IN this appeal Sri Noushad Ali, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-w



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top