( 1 ) THIS revision is filed against the order in I. A. No. 966/87 in O. S. No. 110/70 in the Court el the Subordinate Judge, Chirala,

( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent in this revision, who is the son of the 1st respondent, filed a suit for partition against his father. The 3rd respondent is his mother. A prelimanary decree was passed by the trial court on 22=2=1978, Along with the suit there were two other proceedings one petition filed by the 1st respondent against 3rd respondent for dissolution of marriage and another suit filed by the 3rd respondent against her husband for maintanance, Both of them were also disposed of along with partition suit on the lame day and the marriage between the first respondent and third respondent was dissolved. In pursuance of the preliminary decree passed in O. S. No. 110/70, the plaintiff who is 2nd respondent in this petition filed a final decree petition, At that stage, the petitioners have filed on application under. Order 1, Rule 10 CPC to implead them as parties. Their claim is that the 1st respondent married their mother by name Venkayamma alias Vasantha Kumari and that they are children born to the first respondent through the sai