SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 433

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, S.S.M.QUADRI
Coromandal Fertiliser Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, punjagutta Division, Hyderabad – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE question that arises for consideration in these wrih petitions is. whether the petitioners, manufacturers and/or dealers of cement, are liable to pay arrears of difference in sales tax for the period during which the concessional rate of sales-tax granted by the Government was in force .

( 2 ) TO appreciate this question, the relevant facts may be noticed. Under the andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (for short "the State Act") as well as the central Sales Tax Act (for short "the Central Act") cement is taxable. The Government of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of their power under Section 9 of the state Act granted reduction in the rate of sales tax to the manufacturers of cement in Andhra Pradesh by issuing three orders. IB G. O. Ms. No. 76, dated 24-1-1987 rateof sales tax was reduced to4% on cement sold to Government and government companies. In G. O. Ms. No. 77, dated 24-1-1987 the rate of sales tax was reduced to 4% on cement sold to manufacturers of cement products. In g. O. Ms. No. 78, dated-24-1-1987 the rate of sales tax under the Central Act was reduced to 2% on inter-State sales of cement whether or not the returns were accompanied












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top