SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 471

S.C.PRATAP, UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY
Andhra Cement Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS article 226 petition challenges the statutory notice under section 17 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter "the Act" ). The main contention related not to the veracity of the demand but the purported present inability to pay the same.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-company (hereafter "the company") is a dealer registered under the A. P. General Sales Tax Act. It has branches at Dachepalli, Vijayawada and Visakhapatnam. It is an assessee on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, Vijayawada. Under rule 17 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 (for short "the Rules") every dealer whose annual total turnover exceeds rupees ten lakhs has to submit a return in form A2 showing the total and net turnover every month to the assessing authority by the 25th of the succeeding month. The return should reach the assessing authority by that date. Along with the return the dealer has to submit a receipt from a Government Treasury or crossed demand draft, or banker s cheque covering the full tax or taxes and the surcharge payable for the month to which the return relates. In the event of default the assessee is liable to pay penalty under s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top