SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 519

V.NEELADRI RAO
Vegulla Satyanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Alluri Annapurnamma – Respondent


V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) R-1 herein obtained decree for maintenance with charge and separate residence against her husband i. e. , R-2 herein, in O. S. No. 582 of 1973 1st additional D. M. C. , Tanuku. As per the said decree, the property, which is the subject-matter of these two appeals, was allotted to R-1 towards residence. But, even on 29-10-72, these two appellants purchased the protions of the said property under two separate registered sale deeds from R-2. E. P. No. 235 of 1979 was filed under O. 21, R. 35 CPC for possession of the property given to R-l for residence. The possession of the same was delivered to R-1 by breaking open the locks with the permission of the Court. Then, these appellants filed e. A. Nos. 977 and 976 of 1979 respectively for possession of the same. Those petitions were allowed by the Executing Court. The orders therein were set aside by the 1st Appellate Court. The judgment of the 1st Appellate Court and the decrees therein, were challenged in these second appeals.

( 2 ) R-L pleaded that she had given notice about the claim for maintenance to p. W. I, the father of the appellants informing him that if he purchases the property from her husband, he h
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top