( 1 ) WRIT Appeal Nos. 233 and 239 of, 1991 are directed against interlocutory orders passed by a learned Single Judge in WVMP Nos. 213 and 229 of 1991 in wpmp Nos. 18648 and 18644 of 1990 in Writ Petition Nos. 14532 and 14530 of 1990 vacating the interim directions granted earlier by another learned single judge by which the Regional Transport Authorities were directed to release the vehicles seized by them for contravention of the provisions of Section 192 of the motor Vehicles Act provided in respect of each of the seized vehicles a sum of rupees one thousand was deposited. At the request of the learned counsel for both sides the main writ petitions themselves are taken up for hearing along with the connected writ petitions. In writ petitions - Writ Petition Nos. 14530 and 14811 of 1990 and 4045 and4196 of 1991 -the petitioners are challenging the constitutionality of sub-section (1) of Sec. 200 and sub-section (1) of Section 207 at the Motor Vehicles Act; in other writ petitions, the legality of G. O. Ms. No. 108 dated 12-4-1996 and C. O. Rt. No. 947 dated 4-8-1990 are challenged. As common questions arise in all these writ petitions, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document