SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 22

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, K.A.SWAMI
Golla Seetharamulu – Appellant
Versus
Golla Rathanamma – Respondent


RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition filed under S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the orders passed in Cri. Revision Petition No. 14 of 1987 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the husband the respondent is the wife. The parties are Hindus and the marriage between them took place in the year 1963 at Tirupati according to Hindu religion and custom. Both lived together happily for about a period of three years. During that period they did not beget any children. In December, 1966 she went to her parents house for Sankranti festival and the respondent made no attempt to take her back and from then onwards they started living separately. She got issued a notice on 18-7-1984 to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 500/ per month but the husband never cared to take the notice and reply to it. Therefore, she filed a petition before the Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nandikotkur, under S. 125, Cr. P. C. claiming a maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month alleging that her husband wilfully neglected to maintain her. 2a. The husband, who is the petitioner herein, resisted the application on the ground that she deserted him a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top