SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 86

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Thupiri Penchaliah – Appellant
Versus
Election Court, Kavali – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE question as to what could be treated as material facts for purposes of Sec. 83 (1) (a) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, corresponding to Rule 51 (2) of the A. P. Gram Panchayats (Conduct of elections) Rules, 1978, arises for discussion in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Sri T. Penchalaiah was declared as Sarpanch of the Bogulu gram panchayat, Nellore District by a majority of 27 votes in an election held on 14-3-1988 and one of the four unsuccessful candidates, Smt. Ch. Padmalata (2nd respondent in this W. P.) 61ed the election petition o. P. No. 9 of 1988 before the Election Tribunal-cum-Principal District munsif, Kavali, seeking recount on the ground of several irregularities in the process of counting and the learned tribunal, oy an elaborate judgment dated 18-8-1989, allowed the petition and ordered recount. It is against this order that the successful candidate has preferred this writ petition. The election petition contained certain allegations regarding irregularities in counting and these were disputed in the counter filed by the writ petitioner.

( 3 ) THE election petitioner examined herself as P. W. 1 and one of her co










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top