SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 196

I.P.RAO
B. Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Dawood – Respondent


IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE sole defendant in O S No 3895 of 1979 is the appellant herein. The appeal relates to a vacant site comprising of 365 sq yards in Old Malakpet, Hyderabad. The plaintiff in that suit sought for an injunction on the ground that when he wanted to construct a compound wall having obtained sanction from the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, the defendant who is residing adjacent to the suit land forcibly stopped the work of the plaintiff and did not allow him to do the construction work. The defendant while admitting the ownership of the plaintiff in the suit land, pleaded that he has been in possession of the same as a tenant for more than 15 years and has been using it having constructed a thatched shed and keeping buffaloes and cows,

( 2 ) THE defendant has also filed os No. 4000 of 1979 for a perpetual injunction alleging that while he was running a dairy farm in the open space of land measuring 365 sq. yards having taken it OB lease from the defendant, the defendant tried to untie the she-buffaloes and to pull down the cattle shed. The defendant in that suit who is toe plaintiff in os No. 3895 of 1979 while denying the allegations la the plaint
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top