SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 178

A.RAMANUJULU NAIDU, P.L.N.SHARMA
Superintending Engineer, N. S. Left Canals Circle, Miryalguda, Nalgonda Dist. – Appellant
Versus
Gayatri Engineers Company, Engineers and Contractors, Hyderabad – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE proceedings arise under the Arbitration Act.

( 2 ) THE Arbitrators passed the award on 4-2-1983 upholding the claims of the Contractor. The award was filed into Court of the Vth Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. O. S. No. 232 of 1983 was filed under section 14 read with Section 17 of the Arbitration Act to pass a judgment and decree. The department filed O. P. No. 65 of 1983 for setting aside the award. Both were clubbed and disposed of by a common judgment. The v Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad decreed the suit and made the award a rule of the Court after dismissing the O. P. filed by the department to set aside the award.

( 3 ) AGGRIEVED thereby the department, the Super in tending Engineer, nagarjuna Sagar Left Canals Circle, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District had filed C. M. A. No. 417 of 1984 against the judgment in O. P. No. 65 of 1983 and C. R. P. No. 1152 of 1984 against the decree in O. S. No. 232 of 1983.

( 4 ) THE only submission made by the learned Advocate General on behalf of the appellant is that the award does not contain any reasons. As it is a non-speaking award, it may be remitted to the Arbitrators after setting a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top