SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 168

V.BHASKARA RAO
Chimata Nagaratnamma – Appellant
Versus
Chimata Nathanial – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) 1 In this revision filed by the wife the twin questions that arise are : (i) Whether the wife is entitled to invoke section 125 Cr P C for grant of maintenance in a case where the husband fails to pay the monthly agreed amount under an agreement entered into between the parties for their living separately consequent upon certain differences that arose between them : and (ii) If the agreement entered into between the spouses for their living separately is committed breach of by nonpayment of agreed mothly amount to the wife, whether the remedy open is only by way of a suit for specific performance of the agreement

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are : The respondent is the husband of the petitioner herein Their marriage as per Hindu rites took place on 4-5-1961. After the marriage they lived amicably for some time Two female children were born to them. Thereafter, differences arose. Both of them agreed to live separately An agreement (Ex P-3) dated 12-10-1971 was entered Into between them. Under the agreement, the husband agreed to pay the wife Rs. 50/~ per month. The husband paid at that rate uptil 1985 and thereafter did not pay. Therefore, the wife fi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top