SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 280

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
Kondamuri Anasuyamma – Appellant
Versus
Dist. Judge, W. G. Dist at Eluru – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE third respondent herein, claiming to be a cultivating tenant of ac. 4-45 cents of land belonging to the petitioner herein the land-lady, in S. No. 19/1 of Venkampalam village, Chintalapudi taluk filed an application before the Tenancy Tahsildar, Chintalapudi which was tried as I. A. 1 of 1976. To substantiate his claim, the third respondent herein examined 9 witnesses and marked Exs. P-l to P-10 on his behalf. The land-lady examined five witnesses and marked Ex. B. 1 on her side. The Tenancy Tahsildar allowed that application by order dated 2-9-1977. Against that the petitioner herein the land-lady preferred an appeal T. A. No. 1 of 1976 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, who remanded the matter to the Tenancy Tahsildar for fresh disposal. After remand the third respondent herein examined P. Ws. 1 to 3 and R. Ws. 1 and 2 were examined on behalf of the land-lady C. Ws. 1 and 2 were also examined. At that stage the matter was transferred to the Special Officer the District Munsiffs Chintahatapudi and renumbered as A. T. C. No. 2 of 1980. The learned Special Officer (the District Munsif) dismissed the said petition with costs, by his order dated 13












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top