SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 397

I.P.RAO
Murial Hyden – Appellant
Versus
Dulcie M. Robb – Respondent


IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE first defendant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by the letters of administration granted in favour of the plaintiff to administer the suit properties under Ex. A. 1 will dated 9-1-1956. The facts leading to the filing of the appeal, briefly, are as follows:

( 2 ) ONE Stanley Anthony Corbett (hereinafter referred to as the testator or the executant ) died on 9-1-1979. The plaintiff and the first defendant are his sisters. Defendants 2 and 3 are the children of another deceased sister. The fourth defendant is the widow and defendants 5 to 9 are the children of the deceased brother of the executant. The parties are anglo-Indians.

( 3 ) IMMEDIATELY after the death of the testator, the plaintiff and the first defendant jointly filed O. P. No. 333 of 1979 on the file of the court of the chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad on 24-7-1979 for grant of letters of administration alleging that the testator died intestate. Later on, the plaintiff filed O. P. No. 24 of 1980 which is later on numbered as O. S. No. 241 of 1980 on the file of the court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for the grant of letters of administration in her fav



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top