1990 Supreme(AP) 492
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : A.VENKATRAMA REDDY, SARDAR ALI KHAN
P.R.Prasad - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.No.5552/89 etc.
Decided On : 12-28-90
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. V.V.S. Rao,Mr. I. Koti Reddy
Headnote:INDIAN TELEGRAPH ACT, 1885 - Sec. 7 and the Telephone Allotment Rules, 1980. Rule 2, 4 Non-OYT-Special as amended by Communication.No.2.29/78 - PHA dt. 13.12.1983 - Rules are not statutory but only administrative in nature-Exclusion of Advocates as Professionals in Non-OYT-Special category for allotment of telephones on priority basis - Not legal.
Held : An analysis of the Telephone Allotment Rules. 1980, along with the guidelines issued by the Department of. Telecommunications clearly reveals the fact that the Allotment Rules and the guidelines have been freely and liberally amended from time to - time by the Department in accordance with the exigencies of the situation. It is also obvious that the said Rules are merely administrative instructions and do not have any statutory force as they have not been promulgated in exercise of the powers under Sec. 7 of the Indian-Telegraph Act. 1885. The discretion vested in the authorities while issuing such administrative instructions must be exercised in a just and fair manner. The question of inclusion of the Advocates in the Non-OYT-Special category deserves to be considered keeping in view of the unquestionable importance of the profession of Advocates, which is linked up with the life of the public and national interest.
( 1 ) THE common prayer in this batch of writ petitions is for the issue of a writ of mandamus declaring that the Advocates are entitled to be classified under "non-OYT Special" Category for allotment of Telephones and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent-General Manager, Telephones, telephone Bhavan, Hyderabad, to register the applications of the petitioners on the respective dates when they were made, under Non-OYT Special category and to grant telephone connections forthwith.
( 2 ) ALL the petitioners in this batch of Writ Petitions are Advocates, who have been practising in various courts from a considerably long time.
( 3 ) THE provision of telephone connections is regulated by the rules and instructions framed by the Department of Telecommunications, government of India, as amended from time to time. Telephone Allotment Rules, 1980 have been framed and several amendments have been effected in the rules by the Department over the period of ten years. It needs to be made clear at the very outset that these Telephone Allotment Rules, 1980 are not statutory in character as they have not been framed in pursuance of the rule making power under Section 7 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (Act 13 of 1885), hereinafter referred to, for short as "the Act". Under Section 4 of the Act it is provided that within India, the Central Government shall have the exclusive privilege of establishing, maintaining and working telegraphs and that the Central Government may grant a licence, on such conditions and in consideration of such payments as it thinks fit, to any person to establish, maintain or work a telegraph within any part of India. It is further provided that the Central Government may, by rules made under this Act and published in the Official Gazette, permit, subject to such restrictions and conditions as it thinks fie, the establishment, maintenance and working of wireless telegraphs within Indian Territorial waters and of telegraphs other than wireless telegraphs within any part of India. Under section 7 of the Act it is provided that the Central Government may, from time to time, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules consistent with the Act for the conduct of all or any telegraphs established, maintained or worked by the Government or by persons licensed under the Act. The r 34 rules so framed under the said section are to provide for the matters which have been enumerated therein. A close reading of the provisions of section 7 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 reveals the fact that the subject of allotment of telephones does not fall within the purview of the rule making power under Section 7 of the Act. The Telephone Allotment Rules, 1980 are, therefore, in the nature of administrative instructions issued by the department of Telecommunications, Government of India and have been amended quite freely and liberally from time to time by the Department of telecommunications. It must be made clear that the entire batch of these writ petitions is concerned with the question ot the inclusion of the petitioners, who happen to be the practising advocates, in the "non-OYT special Category". The object of the batch of the Writ Petitions does not appear to be exclusion of any category which has been included in the "non-OYT Special Category" but it is to include the names of the Advocates in the said category.
( 4 ) FOR the purpose of a decision in this batch of writ petitions it is necessary to examine meticulously the provisions of the Telephone allotment Rules, 1980 with special reference to the "non-OYT Special Category" and the various amendments that have been made to the said rules from time to time.
( 5 ) THE term "oyt" is an abbreviation of "own Your Telephone". The Indian Posts and Telegraphs Department issued the Telephone allotment Rules, 1980 vide reference No. 2-29/78-PHA dated 17th Junuary, 1980, under Rule 1. 4 oyt (Own Your Telephone) Scheme is explained in the following Words :o