SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 42

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, V.NEELADRI RAO
Bismillah and Co. - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 01-25-89

The central legal point established is that the purchase of goods for export must meet specific criteria to be exempt from tax under the Central Sales Tax Act.

Headnote:

Tax - Purchase of Raw Hides and Skins - Interpretation of Central Sales Tax Act and Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act

Fact of the Case:

The assessee purchased raw hides and skins within the State and sold them to a corporation for export. The question was whether the purchase within the State attracts tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the purchase of raw hides and skins by the petitioner cannot be exempted under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, as it does not qualify as a purchase preceding the export-purchase.

Issues: The main question considered by the Tribunal was whether raw hides and skins and tanned hides and skins are the same goods.

Ratio Decidendi: The court did not express an opinion on the similarity of the goods, as it held that the purchase of raw hides and skins by the petitioner cannot be brought within the purview of the exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act.

Final Decision: The Tax Revision Cases were dismissed, and the petitioner was held liable to pay the tax on the purchase of raw hides and skins within the State.

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A common question arises in these two T. R. Cs. The assessee, Bismillah and Company, Yemmiganur, purchased raw hides and skins and sold them to M/s. Bharat Skins Corporation, Madras. The said Madras Corporation exported them to a foreign country. The question is : Whether the purchase of raw hides and skins by the petitioner within the State attracts the tax under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 ? Raw hides and skins are taxable at purchase point under item 9 of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. Column (3) of the Schedule says :"when purchased by a tanner in the State at the point of purchase by the tanner and in all other cases at the point of purchase by the last dealer who buys them in the State. "according to this, since the petitioner is the last purchaser in the State, he is liable to pay the tax. But his contention is that he is exempt from paying so by virtue of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with section 38 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. Sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act read as follows :" (1) A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India. "" (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of the territory of India shall also be deemed to be in the course of such export, if such last sale or purchase took place after, and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreement or order for or in relation to such export. "

( 2 ) SECTION 38 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1967 reads as follows :"nothing contained in this Act shall be deemed to impose or authorise the imposition of a tax on the sale or purchase of any goods, where such sale or purchase takes place, - (i) outside the State; or (ii) in the course of the import of the goods into, or export of the goods out of the territory of India; or [2 [1 (iii) in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. Explanation.- The provisions of Chapter II of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (Central Act 74 of 1956), shall apply for the purpose of determining when a sale or purchase takes place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or outside a State or in the course of import or export. "

( 3 ) UNDER sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act the purchase of the goods which occasions the export is exempted. This sub-section does not further exempt the purchase by the exporter. That is done by sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act. Sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act extends the exemption to the purchase preceding to the purchase referred to in sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act. In other words by virtue of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the purchase by the exporter is also exempted. But sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act cannot be extended to the purchase of the said goods by the petitioner, since the purchase by the petitioner is not a purchase preceding the export-purchase, but is a purchase removed by one more step.

( 4 ) OF course the main question considered by the Tribunal was : whether the raw hides and skins and the tanned hides and skins are same goods or different ? It is not really necessary for us to express our opinion on this question since we have held that in any event the purchase of raw hides and skins by the petitioner cannot be brought within the purview of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act. (Of course we have held in State of A



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top