SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 80

S.S.M.QUADRI
Immadisetty Anantham – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and Secunderabad Division, Secundcrabad – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a business-man carrying on his business in shops bearing No. 3-3-416 and 3-3-417 situated at Mahankali temple street near mahankali temple at Secunderabad. It is stated that the width of the street is 30 as shown in the plan under A. P. Urban Area of Development act, 1975. A zonal plan for Zone I was prepared by the urban development authority which was published wherein the width of the road is shown as 50 . It is stated that there is Mahankali marriage hall and mahankali temple and other business shops on the said street ; the locality is a very busy locality and the traffic on the said street is very heavy, resulting in accidents on the roads. Opposite to Mahankali temple, there are temples of Lord Shiva and a mandir of Lord Narasimha and towards north there is a foot-path abutting the said street. At the junction of Subhas road and Mahankali temple street, at the instance of the 6th respondent, a foundation was laid in the middle of the street to construct a permanent arch with four pillars of 2x2 width, in the presence of respondents 4 and 5 on August 31,1988. The width between the central pillars is 22 ft. Lorries, cars, cart-carria



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top