SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 176

V.BHASKARA RAO
Shaik Mahaboob Basha – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Karimunnisa Begum – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two petitions are filed u/s. 482 Cr. P. C. to quash the proceedings in Criminal Revision Petitions Nos. 41 and 68 of 1988 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Court, Nellore.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are : The wife and children of the petitioner-husband filed a petition u/s. 125 Cr. P. C. for grant of maintenance before the Magistrate s Court at Kavali. The Magistrate while granting maintenance to the children rejected the claim of the wife. Therefore, the wife as well as the husband, both filed revisions before the Sessions Court to the extent they were aggrieved. Pending those two revisions, the petitioner filed two petitions to dispose of the revisions in his favour by discharging him from the liability on the ground that the Magistrate without transposing the proceedings initiated u/s. 125 Cr. P. C. into those under the Muslim Women s (Protection of Rights and Divorce) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) as directed by S. 7 of the Act disposed of the same. The Sessions Court dismissed those two petitions. Hence these two petitions before this court.

( 3 ) ADMITTEDLY the petition filed u/s. 125 Cr. P. C. was disposed of by the Magistra






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top