SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 161

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
Bala Swamy – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, who are 145 in number, seek a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the compensation amount due to them in the land acquisition proceedings. In this case, the award has already been passed and the parties approached the Civil Court for enhancement of the compensation. The Civil Court accepted their contention and enhanced the compensation. Aggrieved against the said judgment, the Govt. preferred an appeal before this Court, but this Court directed the Government to deposit the amount. The only remedy that is available to the petitioners for recovery of the amount is by filing an execution petition as contemplated under O. 21, C. P. C. Order 21, C. P. C. provides for the machinery in the event of not paying the amount. When specific remedy is available for recovery of the I amount, the petitioners cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution. In a case where the party has get a remedy under O. 21, C. P. C. for executing the decree that has been duly passed by the competent Civil Court, the jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution is ousted. A Division Bench of this Court



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top