SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 121

K.RAMASWAMY
Araveeti Subbartnam Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Bysani Sivalakshmamma – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) AN interesting question of law has arisen in this appeal. Admittedly one a. Venkata-Subbaiah the father of appellants 1 to 6 and the husband of the 7th defendant and the first plaintiff B sivalakshmamma jointly purchased a total extent of 83 acres of wet land under a registered sale deed dated August 17, 1961. Venkata subbaiah died in 1966. Thereafter, the vendor under the sale deed laid the suit O. S. No. 34/64 on the file of Sub-Court. Kurnool, which was ultimately transferred to the District court, Kurnool, and renumbered as O S no. 50/67 for setting aside the sale. The suit was decreed. On appeal in A S No. 614/69 filed by the appellants, this Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit. Thereafter, the appellants and one another venkata-Subbaiah, (8th appellant) said to have helped the appellants 1 to 7 to have for possession from tenants and to whom 1/3rd share was alleged to have been promised by appellants 1 to 7 for the services he rendered jointly filed O S No. 483/76 on the file of the District Munsif at Markapur for perpetual injunction restraining the respondents, that is, original purchased sivalakshmamma and her son the second plaintiff Ven





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top