SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 196

K.A.SWAMI, S.S.M.QUADRI
Agricultural Market Committee, Bapatla – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Satyanarayana Rice Mill, Bapatla – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE Agricultural Market Committee, Bapatla is the appellant in all these appeals.

( 2 ) THE Respondents filed suits for a declaration that the demandmade by the Market Committee to pay market fee is illegal and void. The main contention of the plaintiffs is that the Market Committee is not entitled to levy demand and collect market fees till facilities are provided enabling the traders to do business and some services are rendered by the market committee. They also prayed for a permanent injunction restraining the market Committe from issuing demand and collecting market fee.

( 3 ) THE respondents arc traders having obtained licenced undersection 7 of the Act and have been doing business in sale and purchase of paddy, rice and other notified agricultural produce within the notified market area of the Committee. According to the plaintiffs, the Committee though came into existence 6 years preceding the date of the suit, have not established any market yards etc. It has not provided any facilities in the market yard. Yet, it has been demanding and collecting the licence fee and market fee. The demand is for huge amounts. The action of the market committee is ultr





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top