SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 190

VENKATARAMA REDDY
P. Ramnamma – Appellant
Versus
Spl. Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad – Respondent


VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) TLIE petitioner herein is a member of Navodaya Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. , Hyderabad. The said Society entered into an agreement of sale on 10-12-1975 to purchase S. Nos. 97/1, 100 and 101, totally admeasuring Ac11-11 guntas at Ycllareddyguda, Golconda Taluk, hyderabad. Since the vendor did not execute the sale deed, the Society filed O. S. 1297/83 for specific performance of agreement of sale on the file of 11 Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and the same was decreed on 8-12-1983. In pursuance ot the aforesaid decree a registered sale deed was executed on 26-8-1984 in favour of the above said Society. In turn the society executed a sale deed for Plot No. 2 on 30-4-1985 in favour of the petitioner.

( 2 ) THEREAFTER, as the petitioner wanted to sell that plot to a third person, she gave notice on 14-7-1988 under Section 26 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act of 1976. The respondents sent a Memo bearing no. E2/1816/26/88 to the petitioner stating that the notice filed under section 26 seeking permission for sale of an extent of 900 sq. yards in plot no. 2 S. No. 97/1, 100 and 101 situate at Yellareddyguda, could not be cons










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top