SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 226

UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
P. S. Ramamoliana Rao – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Agricultural University – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition has been referred to a Bench by the orders of a learned Single Judge dated 1st September, 1988. The controversy involved is whether the petitioner who is working as a Physical Director in the service of the A. P. Agricultural University and working in the college of veterinary Sciences, Tirupati, is entitled to continue till the age of 60 years in accordance with the regulations of the University. We have heard the counsel for the parties at some length.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he was appointed on 4-8-1956 as a physical Director in the Government College at Bapatla Subsequently on the formation of A. P. Agricultural University under the Act of the State legislature (Act 24 of 1963), this college was transferred by the Government to the University along with the staff members working in this college in the year 1969. Subsequently, the petitioner was given an option and he chose to come over to the University Service. The petitioner s pay was fixed in the fourth plan U. G. C. scale. The teaching staff in the University retire on superannuation on their attaining the age of 60 years while the non-teaching staff except certain categories like attende






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top