SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 220

K.RAMASWAMY
Chavali Basvoji – Appellant
Versus
Chavali Shankara Rao – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE five minor appellants represented by their mother Balakotamma sought under Section 8 (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardian Ship Act (32 of 1956) permission to alienate the scheduled mentioned vacant site situated in Guntur. Balakotamma impleaded her major son-the first respondent and the mother of her late husband Chavali Prasdaarao as the second respondent. It is their case that their (ap. pellants ) father died intestate on January 3, 1982 leaving behind their mother P. W. I the first respondent herein their and the appellants and that they are all residents of tenali. The schedule-site being situated at Guntur there is an attempt to grab off it and that thereby the interests of the appellants would be jeoparized, They negotiated with the prospective purchaser (P. W. 4) who offered to pay at the rate of Rs. 79/- per sq. yard under Ex. A-18 contract of sale. From the sale proceeds realized the minors shares would be invested in scheduled Bank so that it would earn good interest. The eldest son supported the case but Sowbhagyamma, mother of Prasada Rao resisted the petition pleading that Prasadarao died unmarried ; at a partition took place on January 1
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top