SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 270

K.A.SWAMI, S.S.M.QUADRI
Pingili Pratap Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Dandu Pullam Raju – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE sole defendant in O S. No. 18 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate judge, Kothagudem is the appellant. The plaintiff Pullam Raju purchased a site in Chatakonda under a register sale deed Ex. A-l dated 20-10-1976 and constructed a house after obtaining permission from the concerned authorities and leased it out to the defendant on a monthly rent of Rs. 100/- on 2-7-1978. The building is situate in an agency tract in telangana area. As the defendant committed default in payment of rent, the plaintiff terminated the lease on 7-12-1978 and filed a suit for recovery of possession after evicting the tenant. The defendant resisted the suit denying all the allegations made in the plaint. He set up title in himself and denied the relationship of land-lord and tenant. He stated that the sale in favour of the plaintiff and the lease in favour of the defendant are hit by the provisions of the A. P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the regulation ). The trial court, as well as the appellate court, found that the plaintiff is the owner of the house; that the defendant has no title and that the defendant is a tenant of the pla















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top