SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 284

S.S.M.QUADRI, K.A.SWAMI
Chanumolu Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vasu Cotton and Ginning Mills – Respondent


K. AMARCSWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order of the iv Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 12th August, 1988 in e. P. No. 12/88 in O. S. No. 36/86. The third respondent in the E P. and the third defendant in the suit is the petitioner before us.

( 2 ) O. S. No. 36/86 is filed by Vasu Cotton and Ginning Mills, Idupulapadu,represented by its Managing Partner, Gorantla Brahamanandam for recovery of Rs. 21,84,336-93 Paise. The first defendant in the suit is sri Venkatachalapathi Mills Ltd , Tirupathi represented by its Chairman, chanumolu Vcnkat Rao. The second defendant is the Managing Director of the Company and the third defendant is one of the directors of the company. The third defendant became the director as a nominee of the State financial Corporation, at the request of Andhra Bank which had advanced loans to the first defendant-Company. The claim of the plaintiff is towards the value of the cotton supplied to the first defendant, which is a company registered under the Companies Act. Negativing the several objections raised by the defendants, the suit was decreed. Then the plaintiff mills filed E. P. No. 12/88 for arrest and dete











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top