SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 279

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, V.NEELADRI RAO
S. B. Dharma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Director of Settlements A. P. Hyderabad – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal is preferred against the judgment of a learned single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant. The appellant had filed W. P. 19058/87 for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction, restraining the respondent, Director of Settlements, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad, from proceeding with the enquiry pursuant to his notice dated 1-12-1987. Under the said notice, the Director had called upon the appellant to show cause why the orders of the Settlement offier, Neliore, dated 31-1-1961 and 27-1-1977 should not be revised and cancelled in exercise of the revisional powers of the Director under Section 5 (2) of the Estates Abolition act. By proceedings dated 31-1-1961 patta in respect of 15 Acres was granted in favour of the appellant, and by proceedings dated 27-1-1977 patta for an additional extent of Acs. 14-96 Cents was granted under Section 11 (a) ofthe Estates abolition Act. The show-cause notice also states the reasons for which the orders of the Settlement Officer are sought to be revised. They are:-" (1) The possession and occupation of scheduled land have not been proved with any documentary evidence. Oral evidence a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top