SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 347

N.D.PATNAIK
Ganga Hanumantharao – Appellant
Versus
Garlapati Prakasham – Respondent


N. D. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed against the order in IA. No. 107/89 in O S. No 24/16 on the file of the Subordinate judge Bhongir. The 1st respondent herein filed the suit OS. No. 24/86 for partition against respondents 2 and 3. In that suit, the petitioners have filed IA. No. 107/89 to impfead them as parties on the ground that they have got right in the property by virtue of the amendment to the Hindu Succession act, Act 13 of 1986, which came into force on 5th September, 1985. Their case in so far as it is relevant for the purpose of this petition is as follows. The property originally belonged to one Anthaiah. He had three sons by name Papaiah Raj" aiah, and Narasaiah. Papaiah died leaving 6 daughters, The petitioners are the sons of three daughters They alleged that the other three daughters are not interested in the property. Rajaiah had two sons by name Veeraiah and Anthaiah. The plaintiff is the son of Anthaiah. Narsaiah s sons are defendants 1 and 2. The case of the petitioners is that by virtue of the amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, i. e. Sec. 29-A a daughter is entitled to an equal share along with the son even in a joint family property go







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top