G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
H. R. Shenoy – Appellant
Versus
M. Murali Krishna – Respondent
( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in this revision petition is whether the revision petition as filed under Section 115 C. P. C. is maintainable.
( 2 ) THE petitioners who are some of the defendants in O. S. No. 3473 of 1989 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, filed the revision petition in the first instance under Article 227 of the constitution of India. The Registry of the High Court took an objection that the revision under Article 227 of the Constitution is not maintainable. Hence they converted it to one under Section 115 C. P. C.
( 3 ) THE brief facts with regard to the initiation of the proceedings and the orders passed thereon which are relevant factors for determining the maintainability of the revision petition are as follows ; the plaintiffs who are the members of the Syndicate Bank Officers association, filed a representative suit, with the prior permission of the court, for a declaration that some of the actions specified in the plaint are illegal and ultra vires and for a perpetual injunction and also for accounting. To safeguard the funds from devastation or flittering away the funds of the A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.