SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 67

G. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sir Silk Ltd. – Respondent


SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal is directed against the order of our learned brother P. C. Reddy, J (as he then was) dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the judgment of the labour Court dated 14-3-1980 in second Appeal No. 45 of 1979.

( 2 ) THE appellant was initially appointed by the Sir Silk limited, the first respondent, on september 17, 1963. He continued to be an employee of the first respondent till 31st October, 1966 when he was appointed by the Birla Institute of Scientific Research, the fourth respondent. He was transfered to the first respondent on 27-9-1976, but within a short time he was directed to report to Mr. Mandelia at the office of the fourth respondent by an order dated 26-10-1976. He was further informed by the fourth respondent that his transfer to the first respondent stood cancelled. The services of the appellant were terminated on 27-10-1976. The appellant filed an appeal against the said order of the fourth respondent, terminating his services, before the Appellate authority under section 41 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and establishments Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impleading both the firs














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top