SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 62

G.RAMANUJULU NAIDU, Y.V.ANJANEYULU
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Housing Board – Respondent


Y. V. ANJANEYULU, J.

( 1 ) THESE two tax revision cases are filed by the State and they relate to the assessment years 1973-74 and 1975-76. The A. P. Housing Board is the respondent. It appears the Commercial Tax Officer, VI Circle, Hyderabad, gathered information that the respondent had effected sales of unused application forms, iron scrap, etc. The Commercial Tax Officer was of the view that the sales so effected by the respondent were liable to be taxed under the A. P. General Sales Tax Act ("the Act", for short) and that the respondent could be regarded as a "dealer" for the purpose of section 2 (1) (e) of the Act. The Commercial Tax Officer initiated assessment proceedings and assessed the respondent, inter alia, for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1975-76 on the following items : @@------------------------------------------------------------------------ Particulars Assessment year Assessment year 1973-74 1975-76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rs. Rs. 1. Sale of application forms. 56,500-00 1,60,336-00 2 Sale of tender forms. 6,400-00 24,441-00 3 Cost of registration plans. 4,600-00 6,353-00 4 Sales of dismantled material. 67,200-00


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top