A.SEETHARAM REDDY
MUDUNURI SUHBARAJU – Appellant
Versus
State OF ANDBRA PRADESH, REPTD. BY THE District Collector, WEST GODAVARI AT ELURU – Respondent
( 1 ) A brief resume of the relevant facts is necessary for adjudicating the issue involved, viz. , whether the principle of constructive res judicata can be pressed into service, so as to prevent the petitioners from raising the point as to whether the declaration under Section 6 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 is not published in accordance with the provisions of law within three years from the date of notification published under Section 4 (1) of ths Land acquisition Act, Sec. 4 (1) notification will have to be quashed.
( 2 ) UNDER Section 4 (1) of the Act, a draft notification, dated 30-4-82 was published in the Gazette. Challenging the same, a Writ Petition (W. P. 3944/82) was filed on 14-6-82. It is pertinent to mention here that pending the Writ petition, there was a stay, but confined only to the taking over possession of the subject matter of acquisition. The rest of the proceedings were however not stayed. Eventually on 31-12-1985, when the writ petition came up for final hearing it was found that Section 4 notification, and Section 6 declaration were published simultaneously, and hence, following the settled decisions of this Court, Section 6 decla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.