SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 26

K.A.SWAMI, V.BHASKARA RAO
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
S. Shivraj Reddy – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three appeals arise out of a common order of the IInd Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 27-12-1983. The matter arises under arbitration proceedings.

( 2 ) O S No. 1557 of 1982 is filed under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration act for making the award the rule of the court and O P No. 377 of 1983 is filed under Sections 30 and 33 of the Indian arbitration Act for setting aside the award.

( 3 ) THE Executive Engineer, Roads and Buildings Department entered into an agreement with Shivraj Reddy (3rd defendant in O. S. No. 1557 of 1982) on 14-7-1978 for formation including matalling and Block topping of inner ring road at Uppal junction. As disputes arose between the parties, the matter was referred to a panel of Arbitrator as per the terms of the agreement. The Contractor made as many as 7 claims. The Arbitrators ahowed claims l (a) and l (b) and rejected the other claims by their award dt. 13-9-1982 ex. A-1. There after, the Arbitrators filed o. S. No. 1557 of 1982 for making the award the rule of the Court. The award is contested by the 1st and 2nd defendants.

( 4 ) THE Contractor filed a written statement that the award should be made











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top