SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 114

K.A.SWAMI, PANDURANGA RAO
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
R. V. Rajaram – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal and the c. R. P. arise out of Arbitration proceedings. The State of Andhra pradesh and the concerned Executive engineer are the appellants. C. M. A. No. 1152 of 1986 is filed against the decree in 0. P. No. 312 of 1985 on the file of the second Additional Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad making the award a rule of the Court under Section 14 of the Arbitration act. C. R. P. No. 2728 of 1986 is filed against the order in o. S. No. 915 of 1985 dismissing the petition to set aside the award under Section 30 of the arbitration Act.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are one sri Rayanam entered into a contract on 24-1-1981 with the state of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Superintending Engineer and others for formation of earth-dam in gorge portion from chainage 3360 to 3380 M of Raiwada reservoir Project near devarapalli Village, Chodavaram taluk, Visakhapatnam District. Some disputes arose between the parties. The matter was referred to arbitration as per the Clause in the agreement. The Contractor made as many as 11 claims claiming various amounts. The arbitrator passed a consolidated award granting a sum of Rs. 19. 39 lakhs towards claims 1 and 3 to 11. Claim






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top