SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 109

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
LAKHAND SURANA – Appellant
Versus
HYDERABAD VANASPATHY Ltd. , MOULALI, HYDERABAD – Respondent


B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by three share-holders of "hyderabad Vanaspathy ltd. ", a Public Limited Company, having its registered office at Hyderabad for winding up the company on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts, within the meaning of clause (e) of Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Kespondent-Company has raised an objection as to the maintainability of the petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioners say that tne Respondent-Company was incorporated in June, 1970. The share capital of the company is Rs. 50 Lakhs, divided into 10,000 cumulative redeemable preference shares of Rs. 100/- each, and 4,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/-each. The three petitioners hold 1,000; 1800, and 2,200 redeemable cumulative preference shares respectively, of a total value of Rs. 5 Lakhs. These shares, carrying a dividend of 9. 5%, were issued on 7-1-1971 and were redeemable at par after 15 years from the date of allotment. The date of allotment is 8-2-1971. When the petitioners asked for redemption of the shares, the Board of Directors, instead, of redeeming the same, decided to postpone the payment for five years. They convened a General-Body meeting on 29-3-1986, w








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top