( 1 ) DEFENDANT 3 to 5 are the appellants. The plaintiff-respondent laid the suit for possession of the plaint A schedule properties free from obstruction of the defendants, after setting aside the alienation made in Ex. A-6, the sale deed dated May 6, 1972 in an extent of 46 cents by his mother Smt. Lakshminarasamma acting as a guardian on his behalf and also the exchange deed, Ex. A-7, dated February 1, 1971 exchanging the properties covered under B schedule therein for A schedule properties belonging to the mother of the plaintiff sold under Ex. B-4 by the mother herself as owner on the even date viz. , February 1, 1971. The trial court declared them as void and not binding on the plaintiff. Thus this appeal.

( 2 ) THE material facts practically not in dispute are that Sri Vasireddy narasimha Rao is the father and Smt. Lakshminarasamma is the rnother of the plaintiff-respondent herein. The father and the mother of the respondent were living together. While so, the mother of the respondent purchased Ac. 2-11 cents under Ex A-3, sale deed, dated July 3, 1959 representing to be a guardian of the respondent. Out of this property she alienated 46 cents under a sale d