SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 141

P.A.CHOUDHARY, PANDURANGA RAO
P. ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
JOINT COLLECTOR, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT AT HYDERABAD – Respondent


P. A. CHOWDARY, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition falls the question of the scope and amplitude of section 32 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and agricultural Lands Act. 1950 (herein after referred to as the act ). The petitioners claim to have purchased the agricultural lands bearing S. Nos. 24, 28, 29, 32, 144, 145, 146, to 150, 152. 153 to 157, 159 to 168 measuring in all 54 acres 27 guntas situate at Gollur village, Maheswaram Taluk, rangareddy District through three registered sale-deeds dated 19-8-1983, 29-8-1983 and 11-9-1983 from the original owners. The petitioners when they sought to possess and enjoy those properties had encountered opposition from the present Respondents 3, 4, 5 and 6 who all claim to be the tenants with respect to the same lands. The petitioners-purchasers of these lands had therefore tiled O. S. No. 353/83 on the file of the Court of the district Munsif, Ibrahimpatnam and obtained interim injunction against the respondents-tenants from interfering with their peaceful possession. But the respondents-tenants applied to the Tahsildar, Maheswaram Taluk, Rangareddy district under Section 32 of the Act and obtained interim order on the sam








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top