SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 207

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
P. Narasaiah – Appellant
Versus
P. Raja Reddy – Respondent


AMARESWARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil. Revision Petition arises out of execution proceedings. O. S. No. . 463 of 1978 was decreed on 26-7-1978. The decree-holder filed E. P. No. 20 of 1979 for realisation of the amount, by attachment and sale of the properties. The said E. P. was dismissed on 29,-11-80 as the decree-holder failed to file the sale papers. Then the decree-holder filed the present E. P. No. 73 of 1981 for the same relief namely, attachment and sale of the properties. The judgment-debtor pleaded thai he has paid the entire amount of one lakh on 5-1-1979 to the father of the decree-holder and the E. P. is therefore not maintainable. He also stated that he filed e. A. No. 184 of 1980 under Section 47 c. P. C. requesting the Court to terminate the execution as the decree amount had already been paid.

( 2 ) THE trial Court tried this issue as preliminary issue and held that since the judgment-debtor has not filed an application within 30 days as required by sub-rule (2) of Order 21 CPC for recording satisfaction of the decree, any payment made by him cannot be recognised by the executing court and posted the E. P. for subsequent steps viz. , attachment and sale of the properties




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top