SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 194

I.P.RAO, P.A.CHOUDHARY
SIRAJUNNISA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD – Respondent


( 1 ) JUDGMENT of the Bench delivered by the Hon ble Mr. Justice P. A. Choudarythe petitioners are owners of excess vacant land measuring 26, 025. 98 sq. mts. in T. S. No. 15 (part) and situate in Bhaktavarguda, golconda. That piece of land falls under the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration. Under the provisions of the URBAN LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT, 1976 such vacant lands are to be identified for purpose of being acquired by the State. The competent authority under the Act had to compute first and notify later the excess vacant land which is so liable to be acquired by the Government. There is a long drawn out procedure prescribed by the Act for the making of such notification. Among those provisions relating to making of such notifications Section 10 is the last and the final provision. It provides for final determination of excess vacant land. Under the said section, the competent authority would publish a notification in the official gazette declaring excess vacant land that would be deemed to have been acquired by the State Government. In this case such a notification was published on 6-4-1983. But under Section 20 (1) (a) the owner of excess vacant land has a right to app









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top