SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 385

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
Bathula Anasuya – Appellant
Versus
Bathula Rayudu – Respondent


P. KODANDARAMAYYA, J, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was laid for partition of plaint A and B schedule properties and for separate possession of one-sixth share. The plaint case is that the first plaintiff is the wife of one Devallu who is the brother of defendants Nos. 3 and 4 and the son of the first defendant. He died in the year 1972 intestate. During his lifetime, he executed a nominal document on December 22, 1965, relinquishing the property in favor of the first defendant. None the less, he lived as a member of the joint family and died as a member of the said family. The said document was never intended to be acted upon but was executed to protect the property against his wayward life. After the death of Devallu, the defendant did not heed to the request of the first plaintiff to perform the marriage of the second plaintiff. Hence, the suit for recovery of shares in the plaint A and B schedule properties.

( 2 ) THE defendants contested the claim stating that the relinquishment deed executed by Devallu (exhibit A-1) is true, valid and binding on the plaintiffs since the date of the execution and Devallu lived separately and he had nothing to do with the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top