RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) THESE cases filed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh project constitutional issues of considerable importance having profound import for the effective exercise, by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, of its disciplinary jurisdiction over the subordinate judiciary by virtue of "the control" vested in it, under Article 235 of the Constitution of India. The focas of the controversy is entered upon whether the Rules framed by the State government by virtue of the power conferred on it under Article 309 of the constitution which constitute an invasion of that disciplinary jurisdiction are to be declared invalid or whether the Rules can be so interpreted as not to impinge upon the High Court s exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction vested in it under Article 235 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) WRIT Appeal No. 130 of 1988 is preferred by the High Court against the judgment of Sriramulu, J. in Writ Petition No. 14588 of 1984 holding that the High Court is not the competent authority to remove the 2nd respondent therein and upholding the order dated 14th September, 1984 passed by the Governor of Andhra Pradesh setting aside the order of removal of the 2nd respondent from s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document