SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 415

V.BHASKARA RAO
Eatate Shri Laxmanji Maharaj Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
A. Narsing Rao – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal preferred by the plaintiff is coming up for disposal afresh in view of the orders of remand of the Supreme Court made in Civil Appeal no. 2382/88.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed for recovery of possession of the suit premises namely ground floor of the building bearing H No 1-6-27 Park Lane Secunderabad for arrears of rent and also for damages for use and occupation The suit premises being an endowed property governed by the provisions of the A P Charitable and Hindu religious Institutions and Endowments act 1966 (hereinafter called "the Act") is exempt from the provisions of the A P buildings (Lease Rent and Eviction) Control act 1960. The father of the respondent- defendant was in occupation of the suit premises as a tenant on monthly rent of rs. 34-28 After his death the defendant is continuing in possession on the same terms and conditions but right from the beginning he was not regular in payment of the rent. In view of the wilful defaults and irregular payments a lawyer s notice was issued on 11-5-77 calling upon the defendant to pay the entire arrears within 7 days and also to vacate the premises. Oa 20-5-79 the defendant sent a reply wi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top