SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 376

I.P.RAO, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
S. Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
High Court of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE important questions which arise in this batch of writ petitions and the civil revision petitions, are whether the appellate authority, named in Section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) control Act, 1960, for short the Act, is persona designata; if so, whether the power of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution extends to transfer of the rent appeals from the file of persona designata to any of the Courts. The facts which give rise to these questions fall in a short compass and as they are common, I ll refer only to the facts is given in the affidavit accompanying writ petition No. 3204/86.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the land lord. He filed R. C. No. 341/71 against the fourth respondent, the tenant, in the Court of the Rent Controller, Secunderabad, for eviction under Section 10 of the Act. The said RC was dismissed by the learned Rent Controller on 12-8-1981. The petitioner filed appeal, R. A. No. 420/81, in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Small causes Court, under Section 20 of the Act, which is pending. While so, the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, second respondent transferred a batch of rent appeals to the Court of the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top