SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 375

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, PANDURANGA RAO
S. Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
High Court of A. P. – Respondent


JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A question of general importance, viz. whether "appellate authority" named in S. 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction ) Control Act, 1960 (Act No. XV of 1960) (hereinafter referred to as the Act") is intended to act as a persona designata or as a Court and whether the High Court exercising its power under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, can transfer the appeals from the Court of the "appellate authority" to any other Court, has arisen in these cases.

( 2 ) THE facts that give rise to these questions may be stated.

( 3 ) IN most of these cases the petitioners are either tenants or landlords. An eviction petition was filed in the Court of the Rent Controller under Sec. 10 of the Act, in one case and it was dismissed and the landlord filed an appeal in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, under S. 20 of the Act. The Chief Judge, however, transferred the batch of such appeals to the Court of the Addl. Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, exercising his administrative power. The validity of the said order is questioned in these Civil Revision Petitions. The High Court by its proceedings ROC No. 843























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top