SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 396

V.BHASKARA RAO
G. Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Ahmed Badruddin – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff. This second appeal is filed against the judgment in A. S. 16/85 on the file of the district Court, Adilabad. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff purchased the suit sites measuring 90 x 50 ft abutting another plot measuring 69 x 66 ft situated in Sy. No. 440 of Utnoor village and another plot measuring 102 x 80 ft, situated in Sy. No. 139 of the same village. The first plot he purchased was from one sk. Hyder, the second plot from one abdul Majeed and the third plot from one hyder Ali, under the agreements of sale and the plaintiff is in possession of the said plots. The said Hyder Ali had purchased the third plot from one Ahmed mohiuddin in the year 1962. Since the date of purchase of these plots by the plaintiff, he is in exclusive possession and enjoyment of the same to the knowledge of one and all. The defendants herein have nothing to do with the plots and neither they are the owners of the plots nor possessors and they have no right whatsoever in the plots. The plaintiff applied for permission to construct a compound wall and it was granted by the gram Panchayat. The plaintiff dug foundations for the constructio










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top