SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 2

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA, UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY
S. KRISHNA MNRTHY – Appellant
Versus
Garnda Seetharathnam – Respondent


UPENDRALAL WAGHRAY, J.

( 1 ) THESE five Revision Petitions under Section 22 of the Andhra pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, were heard together as the land-lord in all these cases is common.

( 2 ) THREE eviction petitions were filed by the land-lord against thetenants in three separate portions of the same building. All the three petitions were allowed by the Controller against which the tenants had filed appeals. In respect of two, the appellate authority, though gave findings on certain issues in favour of the land-lord, which would entitle him for an eviction order, dismissed the appeals on the new ground raised in appeal about the applicability of the Act to Visakhapacnam Corporation and jurisdiction of the controller. Because of this question about applicability of the Act, C. R. P. Nos. 2455 and 2534/84 have been filed by the land-lord challenging the correctness of the view of the appellate court regarding the applicability of the Act, and C. R. Ps. 2427 and 2431/84 have been filed by the tenants seeking to set aside the findings recorded on merits by the appellate authority.

( 3 ) C. R. P. NO. 934/84 is filed by the tenant against the order o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top