B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Three Aces – Respondent
( 1 ) THREE identical questions are referred in these references. The assessee is common. The questions referred are :" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that there was no legal impediment to a major entering into a contractual relationship with others, respectively, from a point of time when he or she was a minor ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the partnership agreement dated 4/01/1972, did not, in any case, have the effect of making Shashi Rani liable for losses occurring or arising during her minority, though the partnership was stipulated to commence from a point of time when she was a minor ? (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the partnership was not opposed to any of the provisions of the Excise Act or the rules thereunder and was not violative of any of the conditions of the licence granted under the said Act and was, therefore, not illegal ?"rc No. 285 of 1980 pertains to the assessment year 1972-73, while RC No. 237 of 1980 relate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.