SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 172

P.A.CHOUDHARY
SANGANAPALLI SATYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
VENIGALLA KOTIRATNAM – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) THE above Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of an application under Order 33 of Civil Procedure Code filed before the Subordinate Judge at Vijayawada seeking permission of that Court in O. P. No. 27 of 1980 to sue as an indigent person. The petitioner seeks to sue informa pauperis the two respondents for recovery of a substantial sum of Rs. l,80,000/- as liquidated damages. His case is that he was a tenant in a portion of the ground floor belonging to the respondents which is situated on the Besant Road in a busy part of vyayawada. Not unexpectedly disputes develoved between bun as a tenant and the respondents as landlords. The petitioner s complaint is that the landlords, having failed in their attempts to get the rents payable by him for the demised premises enhanced, dug holes on the terrace of the demised premises making it uninhabitable. During rainy season rain water used to pour into the rented portion of the building and damage the stock in trade of the petitioner. The petitioner was, therefore, compelled to file o. S. No. 1539/75 on the file of the District Munsif, Vijayawada and sought an order restraining the respondents from interfering with his p







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top