SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 253

A.RAGHUVIR, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
C. SATYANARAYANA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


A. RAGHUVIR, J.

( 1 ) THE above group of writ petitions were lodged between December 1986 to February 25, 1987. The cases relate to the election in 1080 madals and Zilla Parishads in the State. In view of the importance of the questions raised in the writ petitions, alearned single Judge of this Court referred the eases to a Divisional Bench. On February, 5, 1987 the Divisional Bench in its turn referred the cases be heard by a Bench of three Judges. That explains how the three Judges have heard the cases.

( 2 ) IN the State of Andhra Pradesh after taluks are abolished, 1080 mandate were formed and elections were held in the Mandals and Zilla Praja parishads in March 1987 under the Andhra Pradesh Mandala Praja Parishads, zilla Praja Parishads and Zilla Pranalika Abhivrudhi Mandals Act, 1986, and Rules entitled "andhra Pradesh Mandala Praja Parishads and Zilla praja Parishads (Reservation of Offices of President of MPPs and Chairmen of ZPPs) Rules, 1987. Some of these cases were filed when election programme was published by the authorities Few cases were lodged after 1987 rules were promulgated. Some cases are filed thereafter beforr the poll was held as per the programme published





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top