SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 336

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
JAVVAJI SAMBAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
Cheukumalli Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal raises the question as to how far a defendant in a suit can obtain a temporary injunction against the plaintiff under Order 39, rule 1, read with Section 151, C. P. C.

( 2 ) THE earlier decision of Chinnappa Reddy, J. , (as he then was in D. Rama Naidu vs. D. C. Venkata Subba Naidu #1 falls to be further explained in the context of the inherent powers of the Court under Section 151 C. P. C.

( 3 ) I shall briefly refer to the facts. The appellants are the plaintiffs in the suit filed for a declaration of title and for permanent injunction. Pending the suit the appellants filed I. A. No. 141/84 for grant of temporary injunction in their favour and for restraining the respondents from interfering with their possession. That application was dismissed by the trial Court on 13-6-1984 and an appeal preferred therefrom was also dismissed in c. M. A. No. 1108/84 on 30-7-1987. Thereafter the defendants filed the present I. A. No. 8/86 for grant of temporary injunction against the plaintiffs. The appellants-plaintiffs filed a counter contending that the present application at the instance of the defendants was not maintainable. It was also stated that th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top