SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 346

K.RAMASWAMY
Y. VASUDEVA RAO – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LAW and LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS HYDERABAD – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) TWO members of this Bar ably supported by their learned Counsel sri V. Venkatramanaiah, raised an interesting question of law as to the pc wer of the Government under the proviso to Article 309 of the constitution to regulate the service conditions of the Standing Counsel or Law officers of the State Public Undertakings or the Corporations or the co-operative Societies registered under the relevant law. The Government in exercise of the power under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution amended the Andhra Pradesh Law Officers (Recruitment Conditions of service and Remuneration) Rules, 1967, for short, "the Rules", through g. O. Ms. No. 89 Law (Law Officers) dated September 21, 1981, amended the definition of Clauses in Rule 2 (b) (vii) and introduced another definition in Clauses in Rule 2 (b) (vii) and introduced another definition in Clauses 2 (d) (xi) State Public Undertakings" and incorporated Rules 3a, 3b, 8a and 8b and also invested transitionary power in the Government under Rule 8c (for short, "the Amended Rules" ).

( 2 ) THE petitioners mounted their attack on the power of the government to make amended Rules from two fronts. Firstly, it is t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top